Effectiveness of Pilates exercises on non-specific low back pain to determine pain and disability

Authors

  • P. Manikandan Dr. MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • G. Mohan Kumar Dr. MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • V. Rajalaxmi Dr. MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • C. Priya Dr. MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • G. Yuvarani Dr. MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • G. Tharani Dr. MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • K. Kamatchi Dr. MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • . Vaishnavi Dr. MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • G. Muthu Raj Dr. MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51248/.v41i4.1361

Keywords:

Non-Specific low back pain, Pilates exercises, visual analogue scale, patient specific functional scale, modified Oswestry LBP disability questionnaire

Abstract

Introduction and Aim: Low back discomfort is one of the commonest musculoskeletal problems. The Pilates exercises are an approach to stretching and strengthening techniques and specifically train all the core muscles. The intend of the current study was to verify the influences of the Pilates exercises among pain and disability among patients with Non-specific Low Back Pain (NSLBP).  

 

Materials and Methods: A 100 non-specific low back pain subjects were randomly selected for this experimental study. The study includes of non-specific LBP age group between 25 to 40 years, both male and female patients with pain and disability and this study excludes spinal fractures and Pregnant Women. The estimations were taken utilizing Visual Analogue scale (VAS), Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) and Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (MODQ). Subjects are allotted in two groups, Group A (Pilates group) receives Pilate’s exercise and Group B (conventional group) receives conventional exercise. Exercises were given for 3 times a week for 12 weeks and a regular follow up was done for every 4 weeks.

 

Results: Group A (Pilates group) were found to be more effective than Group B (conventional group). It shows a highly significant difference in mean values at P ? 0.001. This implies that Pilates exercise is more beneficial in decreasing pain and functional disability.

 

Conclusion: On comparing the mean values, Group A (Pilates group) showed significant improvement at the end of the study when compared with Group B (conventional group).

References

Kermode, F. Benefits of utilising real-time ultra- sound imaging in the rehabilitation of the lumbar spine stabilising muscles following low back injury in the elite athlete: a single case study. Physical Therapy in Sport. 2004; 5: 13-16.

Biering-Sorensen, F. A prospective study of low back pain in a general population. I. Occurrence, recurrence and aetiology. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 1983; 15: 71-79.

Burton, A. K., Balague, F., Cardon, G., Eriksen, H. R., Henrotin, Y., Lahad, A., et al., Chapter 2: European guidelines for prevention in low back pain, November 2004. European Spine Journal. 2006; 15(2): S136–S168.

Airaksinen, O., Brox, J. I., Cedraschi, C., Hildebrandt, J., Klaber-Moffett, J., Kovacs, F., et al., Chapter 4: European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspeci?c low back pain. European Spine Journal. 2006; 15(suppl 2): S192–S300.

Dagenais, S., Caro, J., Haldeman, S. A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. Spine Journal. 2008; 8: 8–20.

Vos, T., Flaxman, A, D., Naghavi, M., Lozano, R., Michaudm C., Ezzati, M., et al., Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012; 380: 2163–2196.

Andrusaitis, S. F., Oliveira, R. P., Barros Filho, T. E. Study of the prevalence and risk factors for low back pain in truck drivers in the state of São Paulo, Clinics Journal. 2006; 61: 503-510.

Hayden, J. A., van Tulder, M. W., Malmivaara, A., Koes, BW., Exercise therapy for treatment of non-specific low back pain. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews. 2005: 20.

Maher, C., Latimer, J., Refshauge, K. Prescription of activity for low back pain: What works? Australian Journal of Physiotherapy. 1999; 45: 121-132

Da Silva, A., Mannrich, G. Pilates nareabili-tac¸˜ao:umarevisa˜osistem´atica. FisioterMov. 2009; 22: 449–455.

Muscolino, J. E., Cipriani, S. Pilates and the “power- house”. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 2004; 8: 15-24.

Da Fonseca, J. L., Magini, M., de Freitas, T. H. Laboratory gait analysis in patients with low back pain before and after a pilates intervention. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. 2009; 18: 269-282.

Kendall, F. P., Kendall, E. M., Provance, P. G. Muscles: Testing and Function. 4th ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1993.

Vleeming, A., Pool-Goudzwaard, A. L., Stoeckart, R., van Wingerden, J. P., Snijders CJ. The posterior layer of the thoracolumbar fascia. Its function in load transfer from spine to legs. Spine. 1995; 20: 753-758.

Janda, V. Muscle weakness and inhibition (pseudoparesis) in back pain syndromes. In: Grieve GP, ed. Modern Manual Therapy of the Vertebral Column. New York, NY: Churchill-Livingstone; 1986

Sahrmann, S. A. Posture and muscle imbalance: faulty lumbar pelvic alignment and associated musculo- skeletal pain syndromes. Orthopaedic research and Review. 1992; Nov- Dec: 13-20.

Mohan Kumar, G., Jibi paul, Sundaram, M. S., Mahendranath, P., Priya, C., Premnathmargabandhu., Impact of occupation and lifestyle on prevalence of non-specific low back pain among common population: A cross-sectional study. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development. 2019; 10(11): 2118-2123,

Mohan Kumar, G., Jibi paul, Sundaram, M. S., Mahendranath, P., Comparative effect of mulligans mobilization versus stabilization exercise on chronic nonspecific low back pain: A pilot study. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development. 2020; 11(1): 1283-1288.

Shobana, V., Mohan Kumar, G., Rajalaxmi, V., Veena Krithika., Yuvarani, G., Sudhakar, S., et al., Comparative study on core strengthening exercises and myofascial release technique for chronic low back pain, Biomedicine: 2019; 39(1): 125-133.

Lin, H. T., Hung, W. C., Hung, J. L., Wu, P. S., Liaw, L. J., Chang, J. H. Effects of Pilates on patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: a systematic review. Journal of Physical Therapy Science. 2016; 28(10): 2961-2969.

Jadhav, S.V., Kadu, S., Diwate, A.D. Effectiveness of pilates exercises on non-specific low back pain in nursing students and staff of a tertiary care teaching hospital and nursing college. International Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Research. 2018; 15: 35-37.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-31

How to Cite

1.
Manikandan P, Mohan Kumar G, Rajalaxmi V, Priya C, Yuvarani G, Tharani G, Kamatchi K, Vaishnavi ., Muthu Raj G. Effectiveness of Pilates exercises on non-specific low back pain to determine pain and disability. Biomedicine [Internet]. 2021Dec.31 [cited 2022Jan.20];41(4):825-9. Available from: https://biomedicineonline.org/index.php/home/article/view/1361

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)