The effectiveness of craniosacral therapy compared to standard treatment for pelvic girdle pain during pregnancy: A quasi experimental study

Authors

  • K. Kotteeswaran Saveetha College of Physiotherapy, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai-602105, Tamil Nadu, India
  • V. Meena Saveetha College of Physiotherapy, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai-602105, Tamil Nadu, India
  • B. Sathish Kumar Saveetha College of Physiotherapy, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai-602105, Tamil Nadu, India
  • R. Tamil Selvi Saveetha College of Physiotherapy, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai-602105, Tamil Nadu, India
  • S. K. Pavithira Saveetha College of Physiotherapy, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai-602105, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51248/.v41i4.1364

Keywords:

Pelvic girdle pain, craniosacral therapy, pregnant women, posterior pelvic provocation test

Abstract

Introduction and Aim: Pelvic girdle pain is one of major pregnancy discomforts affecting about 50% of pregnant women. There is no evidence that standard treatment is completely effective for pelvic girdle pain in pregnant women. Hence there is a requirement for newer safer therapies such as craniosacral therapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate effectiveness of craniosacral therapy in reducing pain and improving daily life activities which is restricted in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain.

 

Materials and Methods: In this quasi-experimental study, we recruited 30 pregnant women who were clinically diagnosed with pelvic girdle pain using convenient sampling technique. They were divided into control and craniosacral therapy treated group. Using NPRS and PGQ, their pain intensity and disability values were recorded and compared pre and post treatment using mean and standard deviation. The paired ‘t’ test was used for statistical analysis.

 

Results: Group A post treatment NPRS value range was mean = 3.00, SD = 0.85 and PGQ post treatment was mean = 36.87, SD = 4.91. Group B post treatment NPRS value mean = 1.87, SD = 0.83 and PGQ post treatment value was mean = 26.53, SD = 4.42. Since between group significant difference was p<0.0001 it was statistically significant.

 

Conclusion: Craniosacral therapy was found to be effective than standard treatment for pelvic girdle pain during pregnancy.

References

Elden, H., Lundgren, I., Robertson, E. Effects of craniosacral therapy as experienced by pregnant women with severe pelvic girdle pain: an interview study. Clinical Nursing studies. 2014; 2(3): 140-151.

Nor, L., Östgaard, S., Nielsen, T. F., Östgaard, H. C. Reduction of sick leave for lumbar back and posterior pelvic pain in pregnancy. Spine. 1997 Sep 15; 22(18): 2157-2160.

Albert, H. B., Godskesen, M., Korsholm, L., Westergaard, J.G. Risk factors in developing pregnancy?related pelvic girdle pain. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2006 May; 85(5): 539-544.

Vleeming, A., Albert, H. B., Östgaard, H. C., Sturesson, B., Stuge, B. European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain. European Spine Journal. 2008 Jun; 17(6): 794-819.

Firdous, S., Mehta, Z., Fernandez, C., Behm, B., Davis, M. A comparison of Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) in patients with chronic cancer-associated pain. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2017; 35(31): 217

Stuge, B., Garratt, A., Jenssen, K. H., Grotle, M. The pelvic girdle questionnaire: a condition-specific instrument for assessing activity limitations and symptoms in people with pelvic girdle pain. Physical therapy. 2011 Jul 1; 91(7): 1096-108.

Verstraete, E. H., Vanderstraeten, G., Parewijck, W. Pelvic Girdle Pain during or after Pregnancy: a review of recent evidence and a clinical care path proposal. Facts, views & vision in Ob Gyn. 2013; 5(1): 33-43.

Elden, H., Ladfors, L., Olsen, M.F., Ostgaard, H. C., Hagberg, H. Effects of acupuncture and stabilizing exercises as adjunct to standard treatment in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain: randomized single blind controlled trial. BMJ. 2005 Mar 31; 330(7494): 761.

Elden, H., Östgaard, H.C., Glantz, A., Marciniak, P., Linnér, A.C., Olsén, M.F. Effects of craniosacral therapy as adjunct to standard treatment for pelvic girdle pain in pregnant women: a multicenter, single blind, randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2013 Jul; 92(7): 775-782.

Melzack, R., Wall, P.D. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science. 1965 Nov 19; 150(3699): 971-979.

Harrison, R. E., Page, J. S. Multi-practitioner upledger craniosacral therapy: descriptive outcome study 2007–2008. The journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 2011 Jan; 17(1): 13-17.

Licciardone, J. C., Buchanan, S., Hensel, K. L., King, H. H., Fulda, K. G., Stoll, S. T. Osteopathic manipulative treatment of back pain and related symptoms during pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2010 Jan; 202(1): 43.e1-43.e8.

Castro-Sánchez, A. M., Mataran-Penarrocha, G. A., Sánchez-Labraca, N., Quesada-Rubio, J. M., Granero-Molina, J., Moreno-Lorenzo, C. A randomized controlled trial investigating the effects of craniosacral therapy on pain and heart rate variability in fibromyalgia patients. Clinical rehabilitation. 2011 Jan; 25(1): 25-35.

Petrovic, P., Kalso, E., Petersson, K. M., Andersson, J., Fransson, P., Ingvar, M. A prefrontal non-opioid mechanism in placebo analgesia. Pain. 2010 Jul; 150(1): 59-65.

Gallagher, E. J., Liebman, M., Bijur, P. E. Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale. Annals of emergency medicine. 2001 Dec; 38(6): 633-638.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-31

How to Cite

1.
Kotteeswaran K, Meena V, Sathish Kumar B, Tamil Selvi R, Pavithira SK. The effectiveness of craniosacral therapy compared to standard treatment for pelvic girdle pain during pregnancy: A quasi experimental study. Biomedicine [Internet]. 2021Dec.31 [cited 2022Jan.20];41(4):830-6. Available from: https://biomedicineonline.org/index.php/home/article/view/1364

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.