Due to transition in the journal platform, the previously submitted articles, which are under process can be re-submitted here for quick process, kindly co-operate

Biomedicine

Volume: 46 Issue: 2

  • Open Access
  • Original Article

Evaluating Screening Tools for Moderate to Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Early Detection to Avoid Complication

Meghana M1, Srishankar Bairy2, Eldhos Jacob2, Carishma S2, Ajither PA2

1Dept. Community Medicine, Srinivasa Medical College, Mangaluru, Karnataka.
2Dept. of Respiratory Medicine, Father Muller Medical College Hospital, Kankanady, Mangaluru, Karnataka.

Corresponding Author:
Srishankar Bairy
Email: srishankarabairy2012gmail.com

Year: 2026, Page: 119-125, Doi: https://doi.org/10.51248/v46i2.210

Received: Oct. 30, 2026 Accepted: April 8, 2026 Published: April 23, 2026

Abstract

Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with a range of cardiovascular, metabolic, and neurocognitive complications. While polysomnography (PSG) remains the gold standard for diagnosing OSA, its limited accessibility necessitates the use of reliable screening tools, particularly in resource-limited settings.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of commonly used questionnaires, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), STOP, STOP-BANG, and Berlin Questionnaire in detecting moderate to severe OSA (Apnea-Hypopnea Index >15).
Methods: In this prospective observational study, 54 adult patients with suspected OSA underwent overnight Level 2 PSG. Participants were given ESS, STOP, STOP-BANG, and Berlin questionnaires prior to the sleep study. Diagnostic metrics including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated. Agreement with PSG was assessed using Kappa statistics and McNemar’s test.
Results: The prevalence of moderate to severe OSA was 68.5% ( n= 37) . STOP-BANG and Berlin questionnaires demonstrated the highest sensitivity (97.3%), while ESS showed the highest specificity (64.7%) and PPV (75%). However, all tools exhibited low specificity (<12%) except ESS. Kappa values indicated poor agreement with PSG across all tools (κ < 0.12), and McNemar’s test showed significant discordance due to high false-positive rates in STOP, STOP-BANG, and Berlin tools.
Conclusion: ESS offers better specificity but lower sensitivity. In resource-limited environments, these tools may be useful for initial triage, but confirmatory PSG remains essential for accurate diagnosis and management. A combined or stepwise approach may optimize diagnostic accuracy.
 

Keywords: Obstructive sleep apnea, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Berlin Questionnaire, STOP BANG

References

Chen R, Zhu J, Yang Y, Liao W, Ye W, Du L, Chen M, Zhang Y, Yao W, Zheng Z. Evaluation of five questionnaires for obstructive sleep apnea screening in the elderly. Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 11;15(1):1689. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-86041-8. PMID: 39799222; PMCID: PMC11724924.
2. Chen L, Pivetta B, Nagappa M, Saripella A, Waseem R, Englesakis M, et al., Validation of the STOP-Bang questionnaire for screening of obstructive sleep apnea in the general population and commercial drivers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Breath. 2021. doi:10.1007/s11325-021-02299-y
3. Chung F, Yegneswaran B, Liao P, Chung SA, Vairavanathan S, Islam S, et
al., STOP questionnaire: a tool to screen patients for obstructive sleep apnea. Anesthesiology. 2008;108(5):812-21. doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e31816d83e4
4. Netzer NC, Stoohs RA, Netzer CM, Clark K, Strohl KP. Using the Berlin Questionnaire to identify patients at risk for the sleep apnea syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;159(2):494-500. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.159.2.9809054
5. Johns MW. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep. 1991;14(6):540-5.
6. Goyal M, Johnson J. Obstructive sleep apnea diagnosis and management. Mo Med. 2017 Mar-Apr;114(2):120-4. PMID: 30228558; PMCID: PMC6140019.
7. Borsini E, Blanco M, Bosio M, Schrappe M, Ernst G, Nosetto D, et al., Prevalence of sleep apnea and cardiovascular risk factors in patients with hypertension in a day hospital model. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2018;40(3):231-7. doi:10.1080/10641963.2017.1356841. Epub 2017 Sep 5. PMID: 28872361.
8. Ferini-Strambi L, Lombardi GE, Marelli S, Galbiati A. Neurological deficits in obstructive sleep apnea. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2017 Apr;19(4):16. doi:10.1007/s11940-017-0451-8. PMID: 28374233.
9. Sharma SK, Vasudev C, Sinha S, Banga A, Pandey RM. Validation of the modified Berlin questionnaire to identify obstructive sleep apnea in a high-risk population. Sleep Breath. 2016;20(2):785-93. doi:10.1007/s11325-015-1266-2
10. Silva GE, Vana KD, Goodwin JL, Quan SF. Identification of patients with sleep disordered breathing: comparing the four-variable screening tool, STOP, STOP-Bang, and Epworth Sleepiness Scales. J Clin SleepMed. 2011;7(5):467-72. doi:10.5664/JCSM.1308
11. Chung F, Abdullah HR, Liao P. STOP-Bang Questionnaire: a practical
approach to screen for obstructive sleep apnea. Chest. 2016;149(3):631-8. doi:10.1378/chest.15-0903
12. Abrishami A, Khajehdehi A, Chung F. A systematic review of screening questionnaires for obstructive sleep apnea. Can J Anaesth. 2010;57(5):423-38. doi:10.1007/s12630-010-9280-x

Cite this article

Meghana M, Srishankar Bairy, Eldhos Jacob, Carishma S, Ajither PA. Evaluating Screening Tools for Moderate to Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Early Detection to Avoid Complication. Biomedicine: 2026, 46(2): 119-125

Views
19
Downloads
4
Citations