Volume: 43 Issue: 3
Year: 2023, Page: 816-820, Doi: https://doi.org/10.51248/.v43i3.2865
In dentistry precisely recording the soft tissue details and adjacent tooth morphology is a critical process. It is quite challenging for the dentist since the oral hard and soft tissue structures show great variations in every patient. Conventional impression materials such as agar, alginate and elastomeric impression materials are used but these impression materials require patient’s cooperation during impression taking. These impression materials sometimes cause gagging, irritation and unpleasant taste and smell to the patient. To overcome these drawbacks digital impression and digital scanners are encouraging innovations. They increase the patient’s comfort and aids in the accuracy in recording tissue details. The development of new technology in the medical and dental fields is leading to advancements that enable physicians to create treatments and materials that can enhance patients' quality of life. Different IOSs have adopted varied scanning methodologies, which could result in different scanning accuracies. This was done to compare the accuracy of several IOSs and the effects of different variables on the accuracy result. Using 3D scanning technologies, a physical model which is digital three-dimensional computer-aided design (CAD) is transformed. For the design and production of specific parts using additive manufacturing (AM) technologies, this digital output offers several advantages. It is crucial to evaluate the dentistry industry's present level of 3D scanning technology utilization.
Keywords: Intraoral scanners; digital impression; digital technology; CAD-CAM; accuracy
1. Sears, A.W., Hydrocolloid impression technique for inlays and fixed bridges. Dent Dig. 1937;43:230-234.
2. Richert, R., Goujat, A., Venet, L., Viguie, G., Viennot, S., Robinson, P., et al ., Intraoral scanner technologies: a review to make a successful impression. Journal of healthcare engineering. 2017 Jan 1.
3. Logozzo, S., Zanetti, E.M., Franceschini, G., Kilpela, A., Mäkynen, A., et al., Recent advances in dental optics–Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry. Optics and Lasers in Engineering. 2014 Mar 1;54:203-221.
4. Duret, F., Pelissier, B. Different methods of impression in dental CAD/CAM. EMC (Elsevier Masson SAS, Paris),Oral Medicine. 2010:1-6.
5. Kravitz, N.D.., Groth, C., Jones, P.E., Graham, J.W., Redmond, W.R., Intraoral digital scanners. J ClinOrthod. 2014;48:337-347.
6. Taneva, E., Evans, C., Viana, G., 3D evaluation of palatal rugae in identical twins. Case reports in dentistry. 2017 May 22.
7. Saccomanno, S., Saran, S., Vanella, V., Mastrapasqua, R.F., Raffaelli, L., Levrini, L., et al., The Potential of Digital Impression in Orthodontics. Dentistry Journal. 2022 Aug 8;10(8):147.
8. Brandestini, M., Moermann, W.H., Method and apparatus for the three-dimensional registration and display of prepared teeth. US Patent. 1989;p. 4837732.
9. Schwotzer, A. Inventor, Sirona Dental Systems GmbH, assignee. Measuring device and method that operates according to the basic principles of confocal microscopy. United States patent US 7,679,723. 2010 Mar 16.
10. Mangano, F., Gandolfi, A., Luongo, G., Logozzo, S., Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature.BMC oral health. 2017 Dec;17(1):1-1.
11. Lecocq, G. Digital impression-taking: Fundamentals and benefits in orthodontics. International Orthodontics. 2016 Jun 1;14(2):184-194.
12. Gallucci, G.O., ICOI Winter Implant Symposium Global Innovation, Collaboration, and Practical Concepts to Achieve Dental Implant Success. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants. 2014;29:117-136.
13. Imburgia, M., Logozzo, S., Hauschild, U., Veronesi, G., Mangano, C., Mangano, F.G., et al., Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17(1):92.
14. Marques, S., Ribeiro, P., Falcao, C., Lemos, B.F., Rios-Carrasco, B., Rios-Santos, J.V., et al., Herrero-Climent M. Digital Impressions in Implant Dentistry: A Literature Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 24;18(3):1020.
15. Dawood, A., Marti, B.M., Sauret-Jackson, V., Darwood, A. 3D printing in dentistry. British dental journal. 2015 Dec 11; 219(11):521-529.
16. Yanuaryska, R. D., Gracea, R. S. Does dental x-ray cause oral keratosis?. Biomedicine. 2022 May 1;42(2): 292-296.
17. Rana, A., Tandon, S., Kaur, A., Faraz, F., Agarwal, K. Post Covid-19 and dentistry revealing the silent condition-rhino maxillary mucormycosis. Biomedicine. 2021 Oct 29;41(3): 690-691.
18. Ender, A., Zimmermann, M., Mehl, A., Accuracy of complete-and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro. International journal of computerized dentistry. 2019;22(1):11-19.
19. Martin, C.B., Chalmers, E.V., McIntyre, G.T., Cochrane, H., Mossey, P.A., Orthodontic scanners Journal of orthodontics. 2015 Jun;42(2):136-143.
20. Aragon, M.L., Pontes, L.F., Bichara, L.M., Flores-Mir, C., Normando, D. Validity, and reliability of intraoral scanners compared to conventional gypsum models measurements: a systematic review. European journal of orthodontics. 2016 Aug 1;38(4):429-434.
21. Susic, I., Travar, M., Susic, M. The application of CAD/CAM technology in Dentistry. InIOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2017 May 1; 200 (1): 012020.
22. Runkel, C., Guth, J.F., Erdelt, K., Keul, C. Digital impressions in dentistry—accuracy of impression digitalization by desktop scanners. Clinical oral investigations. 2020 Mar; 24:1249-1257.
23. Alauddin, M.S., Baharuddin, A.S., Mohd Ghazali, M.I. The Modern and Digital Transformation of Oral Health Care: A Mini Review. Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jan 25;9(2):118.
Rishika Dhimole, Mithilesh M. Dhamande, Seema R. Kambala, Priyanka Paul Madhu. The digital era in dentistry: A review. Biomedicine: 2023; 43(3): 816-820