Due to transition in the journal platform, the previously submitted articles, which are under process can be re-submitted here for quick process, kindly co-operate

Biomedicine

Volume: 46 Issue: 3

  • Open Access
  • Original Article

Morphometric study of Infraorbital foramen in relation to inferior orbital margin in dry adult human skulls in North India

Fatima Begum1*, Manik Sehgal2, Rubinder Kaur3

1Department of Anatomy, Government Doon Medical College, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
2Department of Orthopedic, Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru Government Medical College & Hospital, Chamba, Himachal Pradesh, India.
3Department of Anesthesia, Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru Government Medical College & Hospital, Chamba, Himachal Pradesh, India.

*Corresponding Author:
Fatima Begum
Email: [email protected]

Year: 2026, Page: 255-259, Doi: https://doi.org/10.51248/v46i3.60

Received: June 13, 2026 Accepted: Sept. 21, 2026 Published: Sept. 25, 2026

Abstract

Background & Aim: Situated on the anterior maxilla, the infraorbital foramen (IOF) serves as the conduit for the infraorbital neurovascular pathway. Safe execution of regional maxillofacial blocks and invasive midface surgical approaches depends on accurate geographical anatomical data. This investigation sought to determine the dimensions of the IOF and quantify its vertical proximity to the inferior orbital margin (IOM) in adult dried human crania of North Indian origin.
Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional anatomical study, 60 structurally sound, complete adult human skulls (comprising 120 bilateral sides) were aligned along the Frankfurt horizontal plane. The linear distance separating the upper border of the IOF from the lowest point of the orbit directly above, along with the transverse and vertical dimensions of the aperture, were quantified bilaterally with a divider compass and a 0.01-mm precision digital caliper. Data were subjected to descriptive summary and paired bilateral evaluation.
Results: The mean distance separating the IOF from the inferior orbital rim measured 6.79 ± 1.25 mm (range: 4.26–11.35 mm) on right sides and 7.11 ± 1.55 mm (range: 4.58–11.45 mm) on left sides. Vertical aperture diameters averaged 2.80 ± 0.55 mm (right) and 2.82 ± 0.45 mm (left), whereas horizontal aperture dimensions averaged 2.79 ± 0.72 mm (right) and 2.84 ± 0.71 mm (left). No significant bilateral asymmetry was detected across any parameters (p > 0.05).
Discussion & Conclusion: Morphometric baselines from this North Indian cohort align well with regional Indian data, yet diverge noticeably from Western and African craniometric cohorts.

Keywords: Infraorbital foramen; Inferior orbital margin; Regional block; Maxillofacial surgery

References

1. Standring S, Borley NR, Collins P, Crossman AR, Gatzoulis MA, Healy JC, et al., editors. Gray's Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. 40thed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2008. pp. 511-520.
2. Gardner E, Gray DJ, O’Rahilly R. Anatomy: A Regional Study of Human Structure. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1986.
3. Sinnatamby CS. Last’s Anatomy: Regional and Applied. 12th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2011. pp. 360-375.
4. Hwang K, Han JY, Battuvshin D, Kim DJ, Chung IH. Communication of infraorbital nerve and facial nerve: Anatomic and histologic study. J Craniofac Surg. 2004;15(1):88-91.
5. Berge JK, Bergman RA. Variations in size and symmetry of foramina of the human skull. Clin Anat. 2001;14(6):406-413.
6. Esper RS, Yara J, Yamamura Y, Cricenti SV. Relações anatômicas do ponto de acupuntura E-2 (Sibai) localizado no forame infra-orbital. Rev Paul Acupunt. 1998;4:19-21.
7. Du Toit DF, Nortjé C. The maxillae: Integrated and applied anatomy relevant to dentistry. SADJ. 2003;58(8):325-330.
8. Kazkayasi M, Ergin A, Ersoy M, Tekdemir I, Elhan A. Microscopic anatomy of the infraorbital canal, nerve and foramen. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129(6):692-701.
9. Malamed SF. Handbook of Local Anesthesia. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2012. pp. 190-205.
10. [10] Cutright B, Quillopa N, Schubert W. An anthropometric analysis of the key foramina for maxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61(3):354-357.
11. Aziz SR, Marchena JM, Puran A. Anatomic characteristics of the infraorbital foramen: A cadaver study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;58(9):992-996.
12. Apinhasmit W, Chompoopong S, Methathrathip D, Sansuk R, Phetphunphiphat W. Supraorbital notch/foramen, infraorbital foramen and mental foramen in Thais: Anthropometric measurements and surgical relevance. J Med Assoc Thai. 2006;89(5):675-682.
13. Singh R. Morphometric analysis of infraorbital foramen in Indian dry skulls. Anat Cell Biol. 2011;44(1):79-83.
14. Gruber W. Ueber den infraorbitalcanal bei dem menschen und bei den säugethieren. Arch Pathol Anat Physiol Klin Med. 1878;72(4):494-496.
15. Boopathi S, Chakravarthy MS, Dhalapathy S, Anupa S. Anthropometric analysis of the infraorbital foramen in a South Indian population. Singapore Med J. 2010;51(9):730-735.
16. Sharma S, Sharma A, Thakur C, Modi BS. Anthropometric measurements of infraorbital foramen and its anatomic variations in dried human skulls. Int J Anat Res. 2015;3(4):1487-1490.
17. Varshney R, Sharma PK, Roy S. Morphometric study of infraorbital foramen in relation to surrounding anatomical landmarks in human dry skulls. Int J Anat Res. 2017;5(3.2):4257-4260.
18. Macedo VC, Cabrini RR, Faig-Leite H. Infraorbital foramen location in human dry skulls of Brazilians. Int J Morphol. 2009;27(1):35-38.
19. Shaik HS, Shepur MP, Desai SD, Thomas ST, Maavishettar GF, Haseena S. Morphometric analysis of infraorbital foramen position in South Indian skulls. Indian J Innovations Dev. 2012;1(5):342-345.

Cite this article

Fatima Begum, Manik Sehgal, Rubinder Kaur. Morphometric study of Infraorbital foramen in relation to inferior orbital margin in dry adult human skulls in North India. Biomedicine: 2026, 46(3): 255-259. https://doi.org/10.51248/v46i3.60

Views
14
Downloads
5
Citations